User talk:2409:4073:4D8E:8777:0:0:AC0B:E50E

August 2022
Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Castration—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  01:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * where is the source that your catholic sect has spoken against it, first provide that, then try to advisenothers. I only tried to do a constructive editing, while you destroy your own credibility with lies. 2409:4073:4D8E:8777:0:0:AC0B:E50E (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * You replied to the wrong person.
 * People do not take kindly to being called liars when they are not lying. Your baseless hostility is noted and is a strike against you.
 * I am not Catholic; I am Baptist. Bad assumption by you.
 * The links to other articles serve as the references in this section. See for example First Council of Nicaea, which explicitly mentions castration.  Linking to other articles does not count as references except if the subject is explicitly covered by such.
 * Even if a section of an article is inadequately referenced, that does not excuse adding unreferenced materials, in violation of the WP policies I showed you. Add referenced materials per the links I provided, OR add references to the existing material, and you will be fine.
 * Reply like this again, or continue to try to enforce your edits without any attempt at constructive dialogue, and we will conclude you are WP:NOTHERE. We are asking you to help improve the article, and adhere to WP policy, not make the article worse than it already is. Jtrevor99 (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I can understand what you want to do on this page, but you must understand that making unsourced edits qualifies as original research, which Wikipedia does not allow. (See WP:OR and WP:RS for more details.)  This is especially bad when you remove material that IS sourced to do so.  A better approach would be to keep the current phrasing, but add another sentence like "Other denominations, such as God's Assembly, have also spoken against it", then add a link to a reliable source that proves that.  An edit like that is likely to be retained. We are not trying to keep you from adding the material that you want to, but you need to do so properly. Jtrevor99 (talk) 03:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)