User talk:2409:40E4:2:CBEB:43C:88D7:9C9B:260B

Welcome!
Hi 2409:40E4:2:CBEB:43C:88D7:9C9B:260B! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Abhijit Iyer-Mitra
Unfortunately Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijit Iyer Mitra concluded with a decision to delete the article. There was another, related, deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Ranganathan (2nd nomination)‎, where the closer wrote: The result was delete. But if someone wants this to actively improve in Draft, happy to provide it. So I took him/her up on his/her offer and asked him/her to restore the Abhijit Iyer Mitra article to draft, and at the same time to restore an older deleted draft called Abhijit Iyer-Mitra. I am trying to improve the draft by gradually adding sourced. I do not want it going back into main-space too soon. Please give me time to improve it and later to get other editors to have a look at it. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Anand Ranganathan
If you want to make yourself useful, why not ask Star Mississippi on his/her talk page to restore the article on Anand Ranganathan to draft and try to improve that one. There have evidently been older deleted versions of Anand Ranganathan and Draft:Anand Ranganathan. These probably contain citations that a person could use to bring that article to an acceptable standard. So if you want the article Anand Ranganathan restored, ask for the older deleted versions to be restored and for a "history merge". A history merge would make the older versions accessible in the article history page. I suggest that anyone wanting to improve the article on Anand Ranganathan ought to be someone who watched Indian television - he is a television personality - so if you have seen him on TV you will have a better idea of what to look for in written sources. That article needs a lot of work. This is a man who has many facets to his life, and they need explaining in different sections of the article. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)