User talk:2409:40F3:23:F46:8000:0:0:0

May 2024
Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pavi Caretaker without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Pavi Caretaker, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Pavi Caretaker. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Excessive reverting may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Please discuss on the talk page why the negative reviews should be removed instead of constantly reverting. The page may be protected from editing if you continue removing.'' — AP 499D25  (talk)  04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)