User talk:2409:40F4:B:5B68:8000:0:0:0

March 2024
I have reverted all your edits, they do not appear to be trustworthy. You use misleading edit summaries and respond to other editors who have reverted you in the edit summaries. Edit summaries are not the place to have a discussion. If you are a serious editor, please use the article talk page to discuss your changes and get consensus from other editors before proceeding. I'd also suggest creating an account to show that you plan to take responsibility for continuing discussions on your talk page, which cannot be done because you use dynamic IPs. I have watchlisted all the articles you are degrading and will revert you every time unless you engage in discussion about you edits on the talk page as multiple editors have requested of you. Really, you should find a different hobby. Skyerise (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Skyerise, i have reverted all your edits, they do not appear to be trustworthy. You use misleading edit summaries and respond to other editors who have reverted you in the edit summaries. Edit summaries are not the place to have a discussion. If you are a serious editor, please use the article talk page to discuss your changes and get consensus from other editors before proceeding. I'd also suggest creating research to show that you plan to take responsibility for continuing discussions on your talk page, which cannot be done because you use to disrupt the corrections of others without thinking why they did it. I have watchlisted all the articles you are degrading and will revert you every time unless you engage in discussion about you edits on the talk page as multiple editors have requested of you. Really, you should find a different hobby. 2409:40F4:B:5B68:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Copper(I) sulfate, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Arjayay, you made these entire articles POV by adding poorly sourced content to this article and also you are showing a profound bias in supporting American English alone and destroying British English alone despite claiming to support all English varieties in the world in a very hypocritical way which is untrustworthy for editors on Wikipedia itself when IUPAC itself mentions Sulphur and Wikipedia itself mentions Sulphur as what you are doing is very contradictory to what you say. 2409:40F4:B:5B68:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi 2409:40F4:B:5B68:8000:0:0:0! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Dyaus several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Dāsānudāsa, the Wisdomlib article that I cited on the Wikipedia article Dyaus shows that Dyaus never raped his daughter by Prithvi, Ushas at all and the evidence for it shows this and you are hellbent in trying to remove this evidence. The article shows that Dyaus blessed his daughter by Prithvi, Ushas and they never had incestuous sex so what you are reverting again and again is very wrong and defaming and demeaning Dyaus completely, so i removed your edits and corrected them, so don't degrade and demean Dyaus and disrupt my improvements to this article Dyaus. 117.252.158.251 (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian boar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Arjayay, the article Indian boar is totally wrong before i corrected it so correct it with the intention to make it correct and you are wrongly disrupting my improvements to correct this article and I now corrected the article and it is perfectly correct now, so don't be hellbent is disrupting my improvements to this article as i improved this article and your edits are vandalism, so i reverted it an if you vandalize that page repeatedly, your editing privileges will be removed by Wikipedia, so understand what I say now. 117.252.158.251 (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.