User talk:24681012 Fernando Gotted

Welcome!

Hello, 24681012 Fernando Gotted, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zsolt Pölöskei, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zanoni (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Zsolt Pölöskei


The article Zsolt Pölöskei has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this player has played professional football to satisfy requirements of WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. Information on Liverpool appearances incorrect. Cannot find evidence of him at MTK at present on their official website, no sources for loan move to Gyori. Possible made up details and quotes as not sourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zanoni (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Zsolt Pölöskei for deletion
The article Zsolt Pölöskei is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zsolt Pölöskei until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zanoni (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton


A tag has been placed on Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. E. Fokker (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton for deletion
The article Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis-Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E. Fokker (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing speedy deletion tag despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)