User talk:2600:1004:B02D:F045:88DB:A66:6903:33F0

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to New York Times Co. v. Sullivan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan was changed by 2600:1004:B02D:F045:88DB:A66:6903:33F0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875575 on 2021-11-19T02:38:59+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York Times Co. v. United States. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: New York Times Co. v. United States was changed by 2600:1004:B02D:F045:88DB:A66:6903:33F0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876195 on 2021-11-19T03:11:24+00:00

Problematic edits
Hi, I saw your edit on New York Times v. Sullivan and at first I thought it was classic vandalism, but then I noticed that you put an HTML comment in there warning about vandalism and I am now confused. Were you trying to draw attention to other bad edits you saw on the page? If so I think there are better ways to do this. Null sigsegv (talk) 04:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)