User talk:2600:1006:B118:DF19:D1D0:4A8E:AB64:D265

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * @Ohnoitsjamie This is not a edit war. There needs to be supporting evidence. Please refer to Wikipedia documentation on what is required to INCLUDE information. 2600:1006:B118:DF19:D1D0:4A8E:AB64:D265 (talk) 20:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Please be aware of WP:3RR, which you are close to breaching. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The earlier Jacksonville discussion
You wrote in an edit summary I'm not too sure about a discussion to not have it but you need a discussion to include it. The discussion was had, as I pointed out in my edit summary that preceded yours. It's at Talk:Jacksonville, Florida/Archive 2. (...jamie and I both left the "s" off the word "Names" so the link each of us left in our edit summaries wouldn't have gone directly to that section.) The claim is sourced and the consensus of the discussion, with only one opponent, was that there is plenty of proper substantiation to warrant its inclusion. Largoplazo (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)