User talk:2600:100D:B16F:A497:D52B:DAAA:77A0:44E5

January 2020
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Hogg (activist) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Girth Summit  (blether) 16:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Hi, please explain what about my edit did not appear constructive. I understand that this is your opinion; however, the language in the template does not make it clear as to why you feel that way. I’m only asking so that I can avoid making edits that you find unconstructive in the future. Cheers! 2600:100D:B16F:A497:D52B:DAAA:77A0:44E5 (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Your edits at the page disparage the subject - not only the one I reverted, but the previous ones as well. If you add further content like that your IP address will be blocked from editing. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I understand that this is your opinion; however, I can assure you that my edits did nothing of the sort. They merely added factual information (David Hogg did not witness the shooting, as he spent most of the episode in hiding, and his acceptance into a prestigious university was a very positive outcome for him). No “disparagement” was intended, and I believe that most readers would agree that such information is quite neutral. Cheers. 2600:100D:B16F:A497:D52B:DAAA:77A0:44E5 (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Your commentary was unambiguously disparaging, and contained value judgements that would be inappropriate in any article about any subject. I'm not going to engage in a discussion with you about this - please don't ping me again. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please, sir, there is no need to be rude. First you unsubtly threaten to block me and now your tone is becoming unambiguously hostile. I would simply like to discuss this matter with kindness and civility, and I am troubled by what I perceive to be a standoffish attitude from you. Now, if I have made a mistake regarding your intentions, then please accept my sincerest apologies. I was hoping that you might explain exactly what about my edits was disparaging and what you consider to be “value judgments.” Again, my only intentions are to understand what was wrong with my edits so I can avoid making similar mistakes in the future. Truly, sir, I am reaching out to you for guidance and I have no quarrel with you. Cheers 2600:100D:B16F:A497:D52B:DAAA:77A0:44E5 (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

That's enough
Any more sealioning and you'll be blocked.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)