User talk:2600:100D:B1EA:9112:D044:2B4F:7136:3EF6

January 2022
Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Warlock without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warlock. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Warlock was changed by 2600:100D:B1EA:9112:D044:2B4F:7136:3EF6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865323 on 2022-01-01T23:07:37+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wizard, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wizard. MrOllie (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)