User talk:2600:100E:B02F:2CAE:49CE:3943:9753:E044

August 2018
Hello, I'm BukhariSaeed. I noticed that you recently removed content from Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Bukhari    (Talk!)   17:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mr Xaero  ☎️ 17:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2600:100E:B02F:2CAE:49CE:3943:9753:E044, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Bukhari    (Talk!)   17:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Mr Xaero  ☎️ 17:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Bukhari    (Talk!)   17:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Bukhari    (Talk!)   17:40, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 17:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.