User talk:2600:100F:B065:9BED:40E9:E682:BA3F:2C5

October 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kari Lake, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kari Lake, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Red Riding Hood (2011 film), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. The use, or non-use, of the Oxford comma is treated as a WP:ENGVAR situation. —C.Fred (talk) 18:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mike Myers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

You need to stop edit warring because if you don't then that can lead to you being blocked from editing, To prevent from being blocked from editing, Stop Edit Warring at Once! Chip3004 (talk) 18:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Do Not Remove Sourced Information in the case with Kari Lake that is also Vandalism, Which can result the loss of your editing privileges by being blocked from editing Chip3004 (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kari Lake. Chip3004 (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring on several articles over a period of several weeks. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.