User talk:2600:100F:B1BC:71A8:DC95:7C7D:D424:F235

Twink (gay slang)
Please discuss your reasons for removing reliably-sourced content on the talk page. (Also I'd love to know which university press publishes flat-earth literature.) ... disco spinster  talk  22:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)


 * infiltrating hierarchial power structures of the sort you rail against really worked well for you critical theory types didn't it
 * I'll try to find a proper paper defending flat earth for fun, but they certainly do publish politically motivated historical revisionism and the incestuous descendants of french schizoanalysis and the frankfurt school like whatever that source is 2600:100F:B1BC:71A8:DC95:7C7D:D424:F235 (talk) 23:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * OK whatever, but don't remove reliably sourced content just because you disagree with the approach. ... disco spinster   talk  23:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's an inherently biased and unreliable source because their intersectional standpoint is inherently politicized in approach by design and is seeking to justify an already held conclusion, not seeking a realistic and balanced view based on actual data
 * it's just genuinely kafkaesque that I can't even like twinks without some horkheimer wannabe inventing racism accusations about it, which by the way it is not a racially charged term the way that presents it
 * so like the source isn't reliable under any normal metric of reliability that isn't just saying "look an institution allowed this to be published" 2600:100F:B1BC:71A8:DC95:7C7D:D424:F235 (talk) 23:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Data-driven scholarship is not the only type of reliable or valid scholarship. For that matter I could argue that your comments above are nothing more than polemic that is inherently policitised (and I wouldn't necessarily be wrong). You're free to add a reliably-sourced counterpoint that includes all the data you like. ... disco spinster   talk  23:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)