User talk:2600:1010:B012:C5AF:75DE:AA6:9D8B:5359

Psychic Photography
There are two articles in this Wikipedia, Thoughtography and Spirit Photography which are linked to each other, and the term Psychic Photography is a search item which goes to Thoughtography. I have some knowledge on the subject of Psychic Photography, as many of my photographs from long before I ever noticed it have unusual additions to them. The term Psychic Photography and Spirit Photography are synonymous. Years ago I tried to edit one or the other of the articles which claim the whole area is bunk, and my edit was removed. I wonder why people like me keep trying to bring light. It is now the end of September, 2021, and at this time I have a pdf on the net titled valoratreepsychicphotos.net. I decided to offer my experience with this area to the public, and what I have to say there should not be discounted. That the other side of life can make itself visible is fabulous. It is not all bunk. I made a list of different types of Psychic Photography in the introductory pages of my pdf, trying to add to what is known on the subject. It is most important to separate what is called Thoughtography from what is termed Psychic or Spirit Photography. These should be two separate search possibilities, and not linked in the Wikipedia or called by the same name.

Whoever wrote these articles claiming a lot of references that "Psychic Photography" has never actually existed, did not include Hans Holzers book by that title. What I most want to say here is that there are TWO worlds we all occupy (but not at the same time), and the differences which exist between the earth and its spirit opposite make it possible for beings there to project images into a camera. This can happen because some people here are more sensitive to the other world (are mediums, trained or untrained), and act as go-betweens. But the one who is a medium for Spirit or Psychic photography DOES NOT DO ANYTHING TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. It just happens spontaneously. Intentional or chance images are generated entirely from the other side.

The Wikipedia should return me (Valora Tree), my original log-in, (was taken away), and not be so respectful of the firm yet not accurate opinions shown in these two condemning articles. Instead of telling the world it is impossible, we should be full of curiosity to find out more about that which cannot be proven false.