User talk:2600:1011:B156:805B:5433:B31E:6EF5:C6D2

January 2020
Your recent editing history at Charles M. Lieber shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * In almost all cases, an individual's religion or ethnic identity is not mentioned along with nationality, partly because it puts unusual emphasis on ethnicity or religion where it isn't appropriate, and partly because it's a common ploy for malicious editors to tag someone as a member of a particular group. Only if the person is specifically notable for something related to those characterizations is it recommended that such personal features be mentioned in the lead sentence. <Context of that kind is usually included in the body of the article, assuming it's a significant feature of their personal identity.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Given recent events, it appears that you may have a different agenda than promoting accomplishments.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)