User talk:2600:1012:A023:B385:BC94:DF39:762E:425B

March 2024
Hello, I'm Grayfell. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * That's basically what this user did on the High Guardian Spice article and it has been reversed. Historyday01 (talk) 13:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, your claim that "the animation community's distaste and ridicule for High Guardian Spice as well as Ray Rodriguez's thread in response to it is referenced in R.E. Hagan's review for the Marquette Wire, which has been sourced in this article much before my edit. This series has not been well received, neither by audiences nor many LGBTQ commentators, showing primarily positive reviews without mentioning this at all paints a misleading picture of the series' overall reception" is completely false. Furthermore, the changes you made are NOT supported by existing sources. I would say it is "review bombed" too, but I've got so many edits reversing that, I believe this is the best text we can come up with at this present time. The Marquette Wire piece is only marginally acceptable, which is why it is only used to cite a fact, but NOT as an actual review.Historyday01 (talk) 13:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)