User talk:2600:1012:B065:F8DB:31E4:61E0:EE11:128B

December 2021
Hello, I'm Akakievich. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Century Plaza Towers seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Akakievich (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I have a neutral point of view on this. If there's a NPOV synonym for "magnus opus" it should be used. I reverted but with what I think is a better phrase. The WTC is indisputably his best known work, per sourcing on his own wiki page. I mean, it's the original world trade center in nyc...probably the best known tall buildings in human history, after the pyramids and the Eiffel Tower... 2600:1012:B065:F8DB:31E4:61E0:EE11:128B (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean now, apologies for reverting so hastily. To me, "masterwork" says more about the perceived quality of the work than its cultural status - for example, I definitely would not argue with the claim that Wuthering Heights is Emily Bronte's "magnum opus", but I personally would not call it a "masterwork", I can't stand it. Perhaps "best-known work" or simply "Yamasaki's iconic World Trade Center" would get the point across better? Akakievich (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)