User talk:2600:1015:B105:5207:5824:B8FC:673E:C71F

November 2022
Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Meters (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Meters thank you for your kind response, however if pastafarianism is going to be treated as a real religion so as to combat religions who impress upon others their views we mustn't make light of it. what we should do is treat it like a legitimate religion because to not do so gives the theocrats more ammunition 2600:1015:B105:5207:5824:B8FC:673E:C71F (talk) 21:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Read the article's talk page, and Talk:Flying Spaghetti Monster. The consensus is to call this a parody and satire. Meters (talk) 22:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Meters I understand that however a lot of people are not treating it with such triviality. persons and public life attempting to show the irrationality of a disparity of Rights between different belief systems. by calling this satirical and a parody is undermining those attempts. and simply because you have a consensus with a select group of people does not give you arbitrarily the ability to decide how to characterize certain things 2600:1015:B105:5207:5824:B8FC:673E:C71F (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Stop doing this. Your edit has been contested and consensus is against it. Read WP:BRD.'' Meters (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * @Meters okay so I looked on the talk page and it seems that I'm not the only one who holds this opinion. it seems that this is being singled out simply because you obviously some have some sort bias against it. by the same logic Christianity should be characterized as a scientifically unprovable and demonstrably fallacious belief system and the intro. it's only disruptive to those who see it as a disruption to the status quo that their religion has Primacy 2600:1015:B105:5207:5824:B8FC:673E:C71F (talk) 22:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, you may be blocked from editing. You do not get to overturn the talk page consensus. Meters (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * You have been pointed to the talk page consensus. You have been pointed to WP:BRD. You have been pointed to WP:EW. Raise the issue on the talk page again if you insist, but if you make this edit again I will ask to have you blocked. And I consider your comments about my supposed bias and my supposed religion to be inappropriate. Please read WP:NPA and refrain from commenting on editors. Meters (talk) 23:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Meters okay my eye point out that you just violated one of the guidelines and policies that Wikipedia has the three revert rule you were also applicable to that rule. the rules state that you cannot change my edits just because you feel you are right and there is a three revert rule meaning that even you believing you are right cannot continuously re-edit my edits. 2600:1015:B105:5207:5824:B8FC:673E:C71F (talk) 04:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)