User talk:2600:1017:B111:4F5A:E803:7444:DC1C:7006

December 2023
Hello, I'm Ternera. I noticed that you recently removed content from Masaru Emoto without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 19:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address,, removed content without giving an explanation. Please always provide an informative edit summary when removing content from pages. If is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes . This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! QuantumRealm  (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 19:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

You are now at 4rr, revert again and I report you. Slatersteven (talk) 19:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment - Hello, my name is Aoidh and I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that repeatedly reverting to your preferred version is edit warring, and that, as described above, there is a particular rule about edit warring called WP:3RR which you have violated. However given the timing of the warning and your last revert I think it's fair to assume you did not see that warning before making that revert, and have not reverted since, so please take this message as a warning that further edit warring may result in a block to prevent disruption to the article. Instead of reverting please use the article's talk page to explain the reason for your changes and to try to reach a consensus before trying to reintroduce the change to the article. - Aoidh (talk) 20:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)