User talk:2600:1017:B40A:E4E3:FD6B:7C43:E109:161B

There is no requirement that a user adds a template indicating his proficiency in the English language; Competence is required makes no such demand, and it's an essay rather than policy. Stop adding the template; should you continue, you will be blocked for vandalism and personal attacks. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Mike. I'm no vandal, but a heroic defender of the integrity of the project against SPA racism-only accounts like "The Master" which lack the basic linguistic competence to edit in English, and who have decided to give white supremacy a bizarre East Asian twist. Anyway, for your edification I brought this diff, where the so-called "master" (so far from being a master that he lacks basic capability in the language in which he was admitting), was told at the Dispute resolution board to not edit articles in main space, for he lacks the basic linguistic competence in English to do so, and here at Wiki, Competence is required. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=698446851. Even if not for his virulent racism, that account is not even close to displaying the level of English proficiency to edit here. He does not understand how case works in English, or how to make subjects agree with verbs, and admits to his limited vocabulary, thanking a user for "teaching me the distinction between domenstrate(sic) and proposal ". Is Wikipedia a charity, school, or after-school program in which free English lessons are given out to the world, or is it an encylopedia, Michael?2600:1017:B40A:E4E3:FD6B:7C43:E109:161B (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)