User talk:2600:1700:12F0:2370:BD95:FEDC:FF96:49B0

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2600:1700:12F0:2370:BD95:FEDC:FF96:49B0) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Firefangledfeathers&action=edit&section=new my talk page], or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 15:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for those great additions to the J&J article. I worry that the statements actually have too many citations. One of our guidelines, MOS:OVERCITE, cautions against an overabundance of citations as it can interfere with readability and paradoxically lead readers to question the accuracy of the claims. Since you've engaged with those sources, do you find that one or two of them is the stronger of the bunch? Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I would say the latter two on the refugee populations, the latter 3 on the homeless, and the latter two under the incarcerated are stronger.