User talk:2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3

April 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disinformation Governance Board. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * When the government decides what is disinformation it is by definition government propaganda. This is essentially the same as the Ministry of Truth in 1984.  If this is a unbiased information source it should provide more than just the government narrative.  I suggest there at least be both sides represented.  Just because someone in charge says something that doesn't mean that is what it is.  That is incredibly naive. 2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3 (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * We can reflect what reliable sources say, your addition was unsourced. We include Josh Hawley's view, feel free to add additional well-sourced critiques. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * What is the definition of well sourced? 2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3 (talk) 14:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:RELIABLE for sourcing rules. It's worth reading the rest of the WP:RULES, especially prior to editing contentious articles (including those on political topics), so you can keep your editing privileges. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-dhs-disinformation-governance-board 2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3 (talk) 14:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Do those articles qualify as reliable sources? 2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3 (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * https://www.foxnews.com/media/mayorkas-new-ministry-of-truth-better-suited-for-dictatorships-gabbard 2600:1700:1D27:1090:28D3:D342:E913:4DF3 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)