User talk:2600:1700:3C90:50E0:40E3:F76B:E347:7D44

Feminist Rhetoric
Feminist Rhetoric:


 * The article starts with the actual meaning of what feminist rhetoric is, and what it supports and holds. Continuing with the article the first header reads “Definition and goals” Which centers on their goals and how they were formed, explaining their beginnings, their members, and their goals to strive. For now, I believe everything is clear to understand and even though these are similar information sitting in the same category, I think it is worth including it.


 * Moving on to the history section, focuses on delivering information about the feminist rhetoric and how some of the movements were formed, how the groups expanded some works, and more about the members that formed the rhetoric.


 * In the theme section, they divided it into subcategories which makes it easier to search for answers and read through the article, also understand better the content. I like this method especially for myself, as it is really helpful to locate information especially when you are in a rush. The subcategories are Methodology in rhetoric studies, global narratives, gender, and race and ethnicity, explaining each category.


 * The challenges section talks about the obstacles and challenges the group has faced. It is a good section as for to show also the negative aspects it holds, as not everything has its positive outcomes.


 * The application section is about how to expand and spread the word about this organization, and how people approach these organizations as well. I believe is another great add-on, as some people might be interested in this.

Overall looking, everything has its source aligned, and everything seemed to be cited. I believe the topic is not very broad as the lengths of the sections were not fully packed of information but it does give enough information to understand the topic in a extensive way. Another thing I noticed was that some of the information was kind of repetitive, and the headers of each section I believe there are better ways to name them, which may help a bit more with finding information easily.

Most of the citations are books but the links all work okay and get me to the articles where they got the information from. Andrecarias (talk) 03:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)