User talk:2600:1700:4009:8CB0:693A:815E:6ACE:9503

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fatlip. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thank you for at least using an edit summary when blindly reverting multiple edits, as I asked you to here, among other places.

However, you are still ignoring (or not understanding) that that is not how we do things here. If you feel strongly about certain edits you want made, bring the individual issues to the article's Talk page. You will need to provide some reliable sources for any insertions you want made, but with good sourcing you can probably find consensus with your fellow editors. It is up to you to find the sources, not the reader (who never sees your edit summary) or other editors (who may not use Spotify [which I wouldn't trust anyway]).

As for "needing to be banned", I do not feel the same way, but if you want to ask for a block, feel free to post your concerns at WP:ANI. Before you do, however, I advise you to consider the grief text at WP:BOOMERANG. A report by a disruptive editor may lead to unwanted results from your perspective. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits)'' 17:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)