User talk:2600:1700:4C95:C0:450A:BD93:B6B6:907F

Foolishness for Christ
I've reverted your content removal at Foolishness for Christ. If you still think the image should be removed, please seek a consensus first at Talk:Foolishness for Christ. But first read the policy at WP:UNCENSORED, i.e. "Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive‍—‌even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia . . . Some articles may include images, text, or links which are relevant to the topic but that some people find objectionable. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should usually focus not on its potential offensiveness but on whether it is an appropriate image, text, or link. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal of content." Meticulo (talk) 09:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Meticulo. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Foolishness for Christ. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. --- and that's some boilerplate with additional information that may be of assistance. Meticulo (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)