User talk:2600:1700:62E1:2000:85D2:EEA8:E6AE:FDE4

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address,, removed content from the page Robert Hare (chemist) without giving an explanation. Please always provide an informative edit summary when removing content from pages. If is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes . This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DoebLoggs (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 12:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Ah, so when you revert something three times or incessantly undo my edits, its perfectly okay and not an edit war, but when I am simply fixing a page and having to fix it repeatedly due to your negations of it, its an edit war. Kindly eat a dick :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:62e1:2000:85d2:eea8:e6ae:fde4 (talk) 12:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:PA: personal attacks are not acceptable on Wikipedia. A good editing guide is WP:BRD (bold-revert-discuss cycle): once your edits are challenged, you should seek consensus for them at the article's talk page before reinstating them (WP:CONSENSUS).  If you think that a source used to support material is not reliable, it's also possible to consult at WP:RSN, the reliable sources noticeboard.  Finally, WP:NPOV is not about the avoidance of criticism, but about reflecting the sources, including their bias.  If this remains the attitude, a block for disruptive editing and not being WP:HERE for the encyclopedia is likely.  — Paleo  Neonate  – 17:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)