User talk:2600:1700:6A30:31B0:5CE5:B7D:3E5B:9C26

November 2019
Hello, I'm UnnamedUser. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Peter Lemongello, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – UnnamedUser (open talk page) 19:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peter Lemongello, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:14, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

“Not as an arsonist”
I just saw your edit summary at Peter Lemongello that implied that the newspaper headline was an admission by police that they had been wrong for accusing Lemongello of arson. I think this is a misinterpretation of the title, and the rest of that certainly doesn't fit with such an admission by police. The headline is saying that while Lemongello fizzled (ultimately did not find lasting success) as a singer, he did not fizzle (he was more successful) as an arsonist. It is suboptimal wording, so I can understand the confusion, but it wouldn't be appropriate to place anything else in the WP article about police admissions unless there are more sources. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)