User talk:2600:1700:8070:7EE0:9DE:9682:ACF4:97B7

March 2024
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Predators (film). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I made this (very) small edit based on the information visible to me through Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic and several other sources. I edited a single word of the film's reception, based on the current critical standing of the film in the opinion of multiple film critics. I believe this edit is correct, and would like it to be reinstated on the page.
 * I am sorry for not citing the sources on the page beforehand, but as the critical scores from these sources were already visible on the page, I did not believe it was necessary. 2600:1700:8070:7EE0:9DE:9682:ACF4:97B7 (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Metacritic clearly describes the Metascore of the film as "Mixed or Average" while Rotten Tomatoes shows a Tomatometer (not that we'd use that for language) of 65%. At best it seems you looked at the User Score on MC. If you still feel your interpretation is correct, please provide a specific reference as to where you see that language being used. DonIago (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I think this conflict is based on us having different interpretations of the review scores. Personally, I consider any Rotten Tomatoes score that is a 60 or higher to be at least mildly positive, and the user score on Metacritic is also positive. 2600:1700:8070:7EE0:9DE:9682:ACF4:97B7 (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * We don't go by our interpretations of the scores, as that would be original research; we go by what the sites literally say. We similarly don't use user ratings unless secondary sources have discussed them, as they're not reliable (for instance, they're vulnerable to vote stacking). Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, this helps. Thanks. 2600:1700:8070:7EE0:9DE:9682:ACF4:97B7 (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)