User talk:2600:1700:9831:7CD0:F0B8:200B:45D6:E002

How does this qualify as notable? This is a relatively unknown person of no note. As far as I can tell, they are still an undergrad and not at all influential or remarkable. duPont Manual and any other school with a successful pipeline to top universities has hundreds of graduates with similar or more impressive profiles not listed and I hardly think we would find it useful to list all of them.

I did look at the “documented superlative”, but it’s not remarkable. Certainly, nobody I know in academia or industry would care. BTW, I don’t mean to single out this person — many of the listed alumni do not, I feel, rise to the level of meaningfully notable.


 * If you are referring to Anjali Chadha, which you prodded, you didn't make any case for your contention at the time you prodded. My deprodding is not saying the subject qualifies as notable per se, but that it is not entirely clear cut. For a prod to lead to a deletion, it has to be very obvious that the article shouldn't be included and therefore deleted. It is not very obvious per the cited superlative. Therefore, if you wish to further pursue deletion, there is a next-level process called WP:AFD. Also, please do not consider this a beginning of a debate here - if you disagree with me and think the article needs to be deleted, AFD is your next step. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 18:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)