User talk:2600:1700:9E80:6050:60BC:11B1:E155:CF88

January 2024
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eilabun without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * H AntiDionysius. I removed that content because the citations included were insufficient/inadequate upon further scrutiny. For example, I noticed the content you included mentioned an "ancient site of 'Ailabu,'" however there is no evidence of such a cite anywhere besides what seems to be fictitious speculation by the author, Imanuel HaVeureni. There is also no mention of a possible variant "Ein Levon" in any source, period.
 * Secondly, there is also no verifiable information, other than an anecdote provided by the cited author, regarding a stone inscription from Yemen indication that the site of Eilabun as the residence of a priestly clan called Haqoṣ. In fact, upon further research into the 24 priestly divisions, there is not sufficient evidence such a clan by that name exists. Furthermore, a cursory browse on search engines, such as Google scholar, only leads back to this Wikipedia page.
 * Lastly, I also removed irrelevant information about a one-day squabble in 2008. Why anyone would include what amounts to tabloid gossip about a village dating back to the 16th century (at least) is perplexing. 2600:1700:9E80:6050:60BC:11B1:E155:CF88 (talk) 07:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)