User talk:2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:9DC5:7B46:97D3:98F5

August 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Db-policy-notice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:9DC5:7B46:97D3:98F5 (talk) 19:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Real warnings
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Db-policy-notice. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I didn't intend to violate the 3RR. I was only making a small addition to the template notice. But Redrose's reverts don't seem to be explainable nor resonable to me, so I kept restoring the addition. And the only reason for Redrose reverting that addition is because that the changes were "undiscussed". This wouldn't make any sense at all. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:9DC5:7B46:97D3:98F5 (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add content or create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I understand now. According to the edit summary, the additions were removed because they appear to be intending to bite the newbies. This would violate this policy. I could consider this disparaging to the template message. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:9DC5:7B46:97D3:98F5 (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)