User talk:2600:1700:CDA0:1060:8AB:8B46:102:10C8

July 2022
Hello, I'm Nythar. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Electroconvulsive therapy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nythar T . C 06:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * my dude, its not like i linked Citizens Commission on Human Rights who have a "documentary" on ect. The controversy section is essentially empty of links. 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:8AB:8B46:102:10C8 (talk) 08:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yet since when was electroconvulsive therapy considered "torture"? Nythar T . C 08:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * see also section is for see also. I suggest you read the links you removed. Ect has been used for torture/abuse. Its already discussed vaguely in article, and probably needs its own section. Im not qualified to write section, hence my minimal see also additions. Youre misquoting/misapplying neutrality 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:8AB:8B46:102:10C8 (talk) 08:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Would it be referred to as "therapy" if it were torture? Perhaps that might fall under a separate category. Nythar T . C 09:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. I suggest you read the history section of the article and return my trivial edits (its just more history). Feel free to discuss the finer points at Talk:Electroconvulsive_therapy. Im out of this conversation, feel free to remove. 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:8AB:8B46:102:10C8 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)