User talk:2600:1700:E040:4F30:C1BD:D263:83E3:E66D

CREATION EVIDENCE MUSEUM
The article is more of an attack than informative. It is obviously written defensively with not a hint of objectivity.

The material is unquestionably going against the accepted norm but rather than offering opposing opinion in an effort to dissuade readers an encyclopedic entry should contain he museum’s information regarding the arrival of written conclusions and if suitable statements to the contrary.

The author no doubt would have had a problem with Albert Einstein’s work in its infancy.