User talk:2600:1700:EC92:25C0:C1ED:F732:DDF8:5BF5

April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Movement for a People's Party, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 06:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello. I don't agree with your explanation behind the elimination of my edits to the Movement for a People's Party. There have been legitimate concerns that the party is ignoring racial and social issues and only focusing on economic policies. For example, I did include a source in which a former organizer and activist for the MPP spoke about racial tensions within the party. She also says that the party fails to acknowledge how the racial and class struggle are interconnected. Nick Brana himself says that the party must solely focus on economic populism. The party's twitter has made also posts that suggest a condemnation of social liberalism and progressivism which have angered and confused progressives on there. I can send screenshots of those posts by email if you want.
 * In your opinion do you think I was being too harsh or biased with my edits? I don't think "being disruptive" was a good explanation for the latest revision. 2600:1700:EC92:25C0:D9D2:8561:B0DE:6968 (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * In your opinion do you think I was being too harsh or biased with my edits? I don't think "being disruptive" was a good explanation for the latest revision. 2600:1700:EC92:25C0:D9D2:8561:B0DE:6968 (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)