User talk:2600:1700:F610:FE10:20D3:32C7:B68D:49EF

April 2023
Hello, I'm The person who loves reading. I noticed that you recently removed content from Angel Reese without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The comments were removed because they were biased comments made to be offensive against the individual, regardless of citations noted behind them. A lot of times it's not about what is written; but how they are written. Your wording should be changed if you feel like that content is needed. Also, Wikipedia is a site that can be edited by whomever and whenever. Otherwise, I wouldn't have had the ability to change it. I don't need to notify you or anyone else if I see something written biasely in an attempt to show insult towards someone else. But I'm not that pressed to revise it back. You can have it boo. You clearly have more time than I do. 2600:1700:F610:FE10:20D3:32C7:B68D:49EF (talk) 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Angel Reese, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)