User talk:2600:1702:1740:2CA0:1D43:8A98:EC54:CFE5

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 2600:1702:1740:2CA0:1D43:8A98:EC54:CFE5, has made edits to article importance values on Talk pages that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you are confused by this message as it does not appear to relate to you, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment rating edits
Well, you certainly are prolific! Since your first edit on Wikipedia about five hours ago, I notice that you have made dozens of good-faith edits on article Talk pages, providing your own rating on the importance scale of those articles, in the WikiProject assessment near the top of the respective Talk pages. Content assessment is a process on Wikipedia for assessing article quality, and can always use new volunteers. The quality assessments are mainly performed by members of WikiProjects, who tag talk pages of articles. I'm sure many of the WikiProjects on whose articles you changed the assessments, would be happy to have you join them, and help out.

Unfortunately, just going into articles gung-ho at the rate of one article every one to four minutes and altering existing article importance assessments by WikiProject members is not helpful, and your edits have been undone. Please hold off making any more edits of this nature, until you've been around Wikipedia a bit longer, and have had a chance to see how the encyclopedia works. Also, if you plan to take up assessments at a later date, it would be helpful to join some existing WikiProjects, and talk with the members there who are experienced in doing them. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the content assessment issue above. You can find this discussion here, and you are more than welcome to join that discussion, and add your thoughts. Cordially,  Mathglot (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)