User talk:2600:1702:1740:2CA0:C0BD:7402:52CD:2647

If you look at my contributions you'll see I typed on average 10 to 20 words of explanation for each of nearly a hundred edits, don't you think own me some equitable quantity/quality of discussion prior to reverting them all? Very few of the articles I demoted had to do with the study of sexuality, had low educational merit, or low interest to an international audience.

why haven't you assumed WP:GOODFAITH. I am not a novice editor. I am editing anonymously. However, I've gone to exhaustive lengths to justify, some would say trivial if not important maintainance edits.

The categories for top, high, mid, or low, importance in WP Sexuality/Sexology, seem to me almost unusable for an expert in that field due to pollution by vaguely sexual topics.

Also, WP:5TILDES. My IP changes. I have no login cookie, so I must sign that way for proper attribution. Anonymous Kekistani 13:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)