User talk:2600:1702:1CD0:1710:A0C0:1098:1BBA:9110

June 2018
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michele Dauber. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Even if you say there are refs, it is critical to provide them on extremely potentially defamatory edits like that Nosebagbear (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * [I have struck through my warning after active engagement with the editor, making it unneeded, as well as a strong possibility that an initial lvl 3 was either unwarranted or at least unneeded Nosebagbear (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)]

Is your complaint a lack of referencing or the content itself? I want to be clear about where I got the information on Michele Dauber whose bio I edited:

1. Michele Dauber's own words. The main source of the most important edit was Michele Dauber's own words. Professor Dauber is most famous for leading the Recall Persky movement to recall Judge Aaron Persky of the Brock Turner trial. As this is what she is best known for, including information on this was highly pertinent to the article - do you agree? Please express some opinion.

In a Democracy Now Interview with Amy Goodman, Professor Dauber stated she had seen the famous "Emily Doe" speech which spurred the Recall Persky movement before the public saw it, and that she had sent it out to media outlets with the help of a maker of the documentary "The Hunting Ground" - because "the world needed to see it' - something like that.

This is all on tape - please help me by showing me how to put in a citation and I will do so.

That interview also included Dauber's repeated claims that Emily Doe had been badly abused by Turner - "gruesome crime scene" "like something off CSI" and "gravely injured" - this last one has a specific meaning - it means being injured so badly you could die and are near death.

These claims are disproven by LA Times documents online - People v. Turner - the cops say there were no apparent injuries - the EMT's say "no significant trauma" and the hospital saw very little - some scrapes on her body but no blood - and finally, Emily Doe herself claimed no injuries when she came to get her cell phone the next day.

So, I do think this material is highly relevant - again, Dauber is best known for leading the recall, her actions during the recall, and statements made to further it - and in the interview, she explicitly states the brutality of the crime, compared to the lenient sentence, is reason to go ahead ith the recall - are highly relevant to any bio of her.