User talk:2600:1702:2211:2030:E8F6:4F7D:BF4E:443A

February 2024
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Dave Emory. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 00:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I attempted to revise the main entry on Dave Emory not with opinions, but facts that you have mistakenly mischaracterized as "opinions." Anti-fascist research is not his primary source of income, and you blocked my attempt to report the truth. Your entry states that he graduated with a degree in psychology. He did not, however, find work in that field, or anything close to it. He worked for years as a hamburger cook. Your article makes no mention of this fact. He has a prison record. You won't allow this fact in, and claim I only offered opinions. You mention Mae Brussell, attach her name to his. But Ms. Brussell, on her deathbed, told him to seek psychiatric help. Emory once threated a woman with sexual mutilation. The people closest to her witnessed her trauma in real time. This episode was investigated and confirmed by the witnesses. Yet your entry on Emory presents him as a highly reputable person. On the air, with hundreds of people tuned in, he stated, "Mae Brussell's tapes should be burned." No mention of this in the entry. Residents of central California closest to Emory know the truth. You are blocking it to present a false portrait of a man with no moral center. Other Wikipedia entries have a section on "Controversies." Your Dave Emory article is crying out for one. As it is, your article is false and defends a man whose abuse of the airwaves is to be deplored. You are blocking factual reporting, not "opinions." 2600:1702:2211:2030:E8F6:4F7D:BF4E:443A (talk) 02:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * No one is saying that information critical of the subject can't be added to the article, but you can't complain "Wikipedia should not be in the business of censorship to protect a disinformation broker who has done serious harm to the reputations of innocent activists. This is a farce" right in the article itself. That is a discussion about the 'article', not the subject of the article. Please add the "CONTROVERSY" section! BUT...it must be sourced and cited. Joyous! Noise! 14:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)