User talk:2600:1702:3E00:58A0:ED4B:CA45:A87F:2349

Despite linking factual sources to my edits the "admins" here are clearly biased and just simply undoing my edits with no explanation or rational. So despite following the guidelines and clearly citing my minor change, they still undo any edits as they dont agree with it. I guess my decades of experience as a physician and actual knowledge of what a source is rather than a .com webiste, don't mean much to someone who has a bachelors degree in communications at best. This is the reason why wikipedia is a complete joke in the scientific community and is NEVER cited in published articles.
 * Wikipedia should not be cited in scholarly or scientific journals and articles, as Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia summarizes what reliable sources say, and is not such a source itself. It has nothing to do with being a "joke" in any community- we are well aware it should not be cited by experts or scholars. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)