User talk:2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:B2

October 2017
Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I noticed that in this edit to Dylan Scott, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  02:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rschen7754 02:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bishop McGuinness Catholic High School (Oklahoma). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bishop Kelley High School, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Feb 2022
I cannot edit the page directly because my internet connection through my phone is blocked. My comment is on Obiter Dicta. I believe the statement is imprecise. According to the book: The Law of Judicial Precedent, edited by Bryan A Garner, there is a critical distinction between judicial dicta and obiter dicta where judicial dicta is suitable for use as precedent but obiter dicta is not. See page 62.

Judicial dicta is discussion not essential to ratio decendi but raised in pleadings or significantly relevant to the case while obiter dicta either has no direct relevance to the case or has been contravened by subsequent holdings.