User talk:2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:B4

June 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Malik Monk. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Þjarkur. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pea Ridge, Florida have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Þjarkur (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Girth Summit. An edit that you recently made to Pea Ridge, Florida seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The article has a talk page for discussing content - please use that, rather than addressing other editors and writing in the first person in the article. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Frogmore Plantation
Hi, I noticed your edit to Frogmore Plantation article. It removed all references! And added stuff without references. Maybe the stuff is accurate, I dunno, but unsourced material is not regarded as okay for Wikipedia. I'd like to help rather than just reverse/delete all, but I may just do that for the time being at least. It would be better if you would create a free account and edit from that, to facilitate others like me interacting with you, and providing benefits to you like having a "watchlist". About the article, it would indeed be good to sort out better about Frogmore vs. Gillespie and what's happened in recent years. Seems like you know stuff that could be used, but needs some work to be acceptable, and i would be happy to help. I have no idea if you'll get this message, but could u possibly please be in touch. I won't necessarily see followup here. You could post at my Talk page or email me privately from "Email this user" link at my Talk page. --Doncram (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)