User talk:2600:387:1:817:0:0:0:85

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Redbeard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Redbeard was changed by 2600:387:1:817:0:0:0:85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906283 on 2017-04-29T23:11:13+00:00.

November 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Caucus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Ixfd64. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --Ixfd64 (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to IQ classification. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  L293D  ( ✉ ) 19:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Intelligence quotient, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Intelligence quotient was changed by 2600:387:1:817:0:0:0:85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963346 on 2018-02-05T19:57:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Intelligence quotient. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Rod Rosenstein, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Siloam Springs High School—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit at "Siloam Springs High School"
On the article Siloam Springs High School, en edit summary you made seems to show personal involvement with the article. Here is the edit summary:""Block quote"Our mascot is Panthers not a hipo"

If you are involved with the contents of this article, I would advise you read the Wikipedia Policy Conflict of interest. If you are also being paid to edit the page, I strongly advise you to read this one: Paid-contribution disclosure. Thank you, Ghinga7 (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Please note: I am not accusing you of a conflicts of interests, I just want to make sure that this is not the case.