User talk:2600:387:6:803:0:0:0:56

November 2017
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fundamental Fysiks Group have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Carol Corrigan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Del Oro High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Granite Bay High School, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock request October 2020

 * , this refers to a range block you have placed on 2600:387:6:800::/60, so perhaps you can comment. Here are my observations. I have checked every edit from the IP range from three months before the block to now, and a sample spread out across a period extending back before then. Certainly there's a significant number of vandalism edits there, but they are in fact a minority of all the edits, so the collateral damage is likely to exceed the benefit. Blocking such a large range for as long as a year, with such an unfavourable ratio of good to bad edits seems doubtful. Most of the edits are marked as mobile edits, and I don't see any evidence whatever to suggest that any significant proportion of those edits which are vandalism are from one person. JBW (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)