User talk:2600:387:8:9:0:0:0:76

February 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Dom Orejudos, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kris Kovick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

See wp:BRD Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Dom Orejudos. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop making disruptive edits. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kris Kovick. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dale Lazarov. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dale Lazarov was changed by 2600:387:8:9:0:0:0:76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886491 on 2017-02-18T00:29:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arapahoe High School (Colorado) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arapahoe High School (Colorado) was changed by 2600:387:8:9:0:0:0:76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917722 on 2017-03-02T00:56:50+00:00.
 * The February edits were made by a known block-evader. This edit appears to be a single instance of petty vandalism by someone else. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dallas County District Attorney have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to Americas (terminology) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.