User talk:2600:387:9:3:0:0:0:62

Please see The Talk Page for the movie for an explanation.Crboyer (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. '''Since you haven't explained yourself, I'll explain. Abe's Peculiarity skipped Frank and passed on to Jake. That means Frank evidently doesn't have a Peculiarity. It's disruptive that you keep making the same changes and not explaining yourself. Especially when there's evidence to the contrary.''' Crboyer (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (film), you may be blocked from editing. '''There is no evidence that Frank is or is not a Peculiar. So Non-Peculiar Adult is accurate. Stop being disruptive.''' Crboyer (talk) 00:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (film). '''We keep explaining why Frank is considered Non-Peculiar. Why can't you explain why you keep switching it around?''' Crboyer (talk) 00:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Silviu Petrescu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:25, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Silviu Petrescu was changed by 2600:387:9:3:0:0:0:62 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9069 on 2018-07-22T02:25:36+00:00.