User talk:2600:387:C:6B12:0:0:0:9

February 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Tom Wolf have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Wind turbine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!🗣) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  02:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Wolf, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:21, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Why I reverted your edit:
I did not necessarily say it was vandalism. My intention with the revert was that the article talk page message was a bit harsh. I should've made myself more clear with that. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!🗣) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  02:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)