User talk:2600:387:F:781B:0:0:0:B


 * This is a checkuser block and so can't be directly handled by normal admins. Q  T C 18:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * the block logs are screwy here. The block noted as mine was actually done by . I modified it to an "ACC ignore" CU block a week or so ago in response to some rather serious abuse, it looks like NinjaRobotPirate was going after the same troll, and I'm not comfortable lowering the settings at this time. Unfortunately we do sometimes block anonymous editing in response to abuse and to protect our users, and these blocks sometimes do affect innocent users. They can request an account at WP:ACC.
 * your /41 partial block is redundant to the /40 siteblock and is making the logs do funny things. Can we get rid of it? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I thought I couldn’t use ACC? --2600:387:F:781B:0:0:0:B (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The /40 is anon-only, and the /41 is a hard block. They do different things.  The hard block is to stop anyone from posting to those pages whether they're logged in or anonymous.  This is to stop harassment.  If it were removed, logged-in editors could post to those pages.  I don't see why ACC is impossible.  The CU block is a partial block with account creation enabled.  It's not stopping anyone from creating an account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * , You're right, I was assigning the opposite behavior to the ACC-ignore comment on the wider block.  I apologize for the confusion, you can ignore my comment about not being able to WP:ACC an account.  Q  T C 03:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)