User talk:2600:4040:550E:7800:A511:EF54:F46D:EB05

Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Exome sequencing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Moriwen (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not sure why the below citation is used for Exome sequencing. This citation should refer to an article that actually developed exome sequencing in otherwords that article which first demonstrated its utility and not the last article or most recent article. So Erjavec should be removed. Hope this helps.
 * Erjavec SO, Gelfman S, Abdelaziz AR, Lee EY, Monga I, Alkelai A, Ionita-Laza I, Petukhova L, Christiano AM (Feb 2022). "Whole exome sequencing in Alopecia Areata identifies rare variants in KRT82". Nat Commun. 13 (1): 800. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13..800E. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28343-3. PMC 8831607. PMID 35145093. 2600:4040:550E:7800:A511:EF54:F46D:EB05 (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you'd like to find a better citation, please feel welcome to do so -- just don't delete the existing citation without a replacement.— Moriwen (talk) 00:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Moriwen
 * When you remove the first reference, the de facto reference in that section goes to reference 2 (Ng et al.) which is actually the right reference for this sentence. This reference should be the right reference for this wiki page as this was the first demonstration of Exome sequencing. So Ng et al., 2009 instead is the best reference which is currently reference 2. The opening sentence in Wiki should not have such a catastrophic wrong information.
 * The fourth sentence ending in "...any high-throughput DNA sequencing technology" is generic and it actually talks of sequencing technology rather than Exome sequencing. It does not need a reference, but if it must then the right reference would be to use a massively parallel sequencing paper instead of Ng et al., 2009. The right reference would be the Solexa/Illumina reference of David Bentley in Nature in 2008. This would then be reference 2 and is shown below.
 * Bentley, D., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456, 53–59 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07517 2600:4040:550E:7800:A511:EF54:F46D:EB05 (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)