User talk:2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A

April 2023
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that in this edit to History of lesbianism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I explained why perfectly. The explanation just wasn't satisfactory to your liking, but was fully explained Nonetheless and has been documented. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 02:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of lesbianism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 00:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at History of lesbianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 02:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Nobody's afraid of threats. If they want to know better, then they need to do more research besides posting dubious unproven claims with pictures in efforts to falsify and backdate homosexuality. Furthermore, out of the 115+ references and further reading options, none are presented to support the claims provided here, making Wikipedia look more like a joke and them look more like a propagandist. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * How do you figure that, given there was a reference right after the text you deleted? —C.Fred (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Because upon reviewing the document of the Carlsberg papyrus, that is provided, it tells you itself it's largely dependent on one source, was just put in there last month!...., And the papyrus is actually related to being a medical papyrus that identifies more with birth genders, nothing to do with proving claims of lesbianism in ancient Egypt, and a very dubious source altogether from being so short in information. Thus is false info being propagated. There were zero traces of it in Africa previous to the Greece civilization and it's rise. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 09:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 02:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * you can give me the heads up all you want. Tell them next time they want to put false information on here, at least make sure they have a reference for it out of the 115 plus references that are listed that do not address the issue that is being edited due to falsified claims 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * blocking me is not going to stop the truth from happening. I will be back in a few days and with more resources. Trying to pile on me because you guys did not provide any references for claims that are unfounded is only going to make you look worse as an information conduit. and when the people that I do contact find out how people are trying to backdate lesbianism into African culture especially with what's going on right now, you guys are going to suffer in the long run and people are going to discredit you even more than they do now. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * this will be the last time we have a conversation especially since you're the one that pushed the button. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Then we'll block you for longer. You're seriously asserting that there was no homosexuality in ancient Egypt?  Acroterion   (talk)   03:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * your mild threats is only making you look worse as a protector of information. It is not my fault that you guys had your facts wrong this time. And it isn't the first time. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * and I don't personally have to assert whether or not there was homosexuality in egypt, all one has to do is take a class. All you have to do is go to college and take a collegiate course and they will provide the evidence that shows clearly there was not any homosexuality or lesbianism in that area. But my concern isn't about that specifically it's about the denial of the right for people to provide factual evidence to the claims on this website when they say that 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I thought so 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 03:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * And yet, just checked the only link provided which was to the Carlsberg papyrus. THERE WAS NO INDICATION THERE ON THE TOPIC OF LESBIANISM AS I HAD EXPLAINED. THAT'S RIGHT, IT'S ONLY REFERRED TO AS A MEDICAL PAPYRUS, NOT A SOCIAL-CULTURAL PAPYRUS. IT WAS JUST PUT IN THERE LAST MONTH, AND THE WORK FROM THAT AUTHOR REMAINS UNPUBLISHED, WHICH MEANS TO MY POINT THAT THIS IS AN UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM AND SOURCE ABOUT AN ANCIENT CULTURE THEY DID NOT DO PROPER RESEARCH ON! AND EVEN THIS PRODUCTION IS SKEPTICAL AT BEST. 2600:4040:72E5:3400:B001:5F30:97FE:D5A (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If the source is unpublished, as you claim, how did you get a copy of it to determine it's only about the Carlsberg papyrus? And, out of curiosity, do you speak Italian? It looks, from the title, like the source is in Italian. —C.Fred (talk) 11:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)