User talk:2600:4040:A8B2:5500:C9E9:D094:9008:BBE1

September 2023
Hello, I'm CocaPopsRather. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Richard Heart have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CocaPopsRather (talk) 17:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Why do you consider it not constructive? I cited the original Press Release instead of the automated pick up of the article by Forbes India as it was stated even on the website itself. I believe citing the original source is far more constructive as people maybe be misled to believe Forbes has written the article.
 * In regards to citing Richard Heart's own Twitter post to state he was a part of something seems highly unreliable as anyone can doctor such things but I've decided to just leave it be. 2600:4040:A8B2:5500:C9E9:D094:9008:BBE1 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I will be revert your changes back in regards to citing the source as the original link to archive.today doesn't even work as it seems to be stuck in a captcha cycle. 2600:4040:A8B2:5500:C9E9:D094:9008:BBE1 (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)